![]() When you see that a lot of your customers want those features (since a long time!) then, either way, include it (RAW HDR), make a proper SDK and include external developers or support RAW HDR DNG from Competitors -). ![]() Sure, the final rendering would take some time but other than that.Īnd that flexibility simply does not exist with Heliconsoft or Photoshop - at least not as far as I know. There's no reason why it shouldn't just keep the original files and simply load all the combined RAWs into one virtual file, using all available data. In my opinion there should be no reason why a stacked image (whether as a panorama or focus stacking or HDR) should be the result of one single file or not be based on RAW files (as long as they are all treated the same way and there's a process to align them automatically/manually - which would be similar to Keystones). I personally don't like to have to render the RAW images first and then stack them (as it would be necessary for Photoshop) and then lose all the flexibility of a RAW file. That's as may be but if we consider Photoshop to be the leading player for editing images with layers - would it have made sense not to introduce it?Īs for using plugins - sure, that's fine if it works well enough and you can still edit the files afterwards.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |